Transform litigation from a reactive scramble into a proactive strategy. Centralize your case files, evidence, and deadlines, acting as an AI co-counsel that predicts scenarios and drafts cross-examinations.

Witness statement conflicts with Page 42 of the signed MSA.
A complete suite of AI-native tools designed specifically for complex dispute resolution and enterprise litigation.
Trigger an asynchronous AI worker that scours your firm's private Knowledge Base (past cases, precedents) to build a structured, cited research report while you focus on high-level strategy.
Upload raw discovery dumps. The AI instantly reads, summarizes, and tags every document, routing scans to Google DocumentAI for flawless OCR.
Predict which demands are likely to succeed based on historical rulings and generate Best Case vs. Worst Case scenario models instantly.
Don't guess what facts are missing. The AI reviews your initial demands and evidence, automatically generating the 5 critical questions you need to ask your client to plug holes before moving forward.
Q1: Do we have written confirmation of the delivery delay from the vendor on June 14th?
Q2: Has the client previously invoked a force majeure clause with this specific counterparty?
A seamless workflow that transforms disorganized case files into an actionable, proactive legal strategy.
Drag and drop thousands of pages of raw evidence. The system automatically routes scanned images to DocumentAI for OCR and instantly summarizes the core facts.
Don't just read the summary—chat with it. Ask the AI how a new piece of evidence affects the worst-case scenario or contradicts a witness statement.
Based on the identified contradictions, the AI automatically drafts highly targeted questions for opposing counsel and hostile witnesses.
Does this email contradict the CFO's testimony regarding the Q3 targets?
Yes. The email explicitly states the targets were lowered on August 12th, directly contradicting the CFO's statement on Page 44 of the deposition.
Litigation shouldn't be a guessing game. LexOS Intell analyzes historical rulings from specific courts and judges to provide data-driven probabilities of success. By understanding how a particular judge has ruled on similar precedents, your legal team can make confident decisions on whether to settle, negotiate, or proceed to trial.
Sifting through thousands of pages of discovery documents is error-prone and time-consuming. Our AI ingestion engine reads transcripts, emails, and financial records instantly, surfacing contradictions in witness testimonies and identifying critical "smoking gun" documents that human reviewers might miss.
Email from CEO confirming product delay. (Exhibit C)
Contradiction: Investor brief claims development is on schedule. (Exhibit F)
Your case files are now conversational. Chat directly with your finalized strategy and research reports. Need to pivot? Just ask the AI how a new piece of evidence affects the worst-case scenario.
The contradiction in Exhibit F significantly weakens their claim. Our model adjusts the Summary Judgment probability for Hon. J. Henderson from 42% to 68%.
I recommend introducing this during the CFO's deposition. Would you like me to draft 3 cross-examination questions focusing on this discrepancy?
Securely invite external co-counsel or clients to view specific case dashboards using encrypted, time-limited signed URLs. Solo practitioners can strip PII from successful case strategies and publish them as templates to the LexOS Community.
Built-in middleware automatically tracks the time your team spends working within a specific case dashboard. Every AI action and OCR scan is strictly accounted for, ensuring transparent billing against your organization's plan.
From raw uploads to cross-examination questions in minutes, not weeks.
By actively identifying missing facts and generating worst-case scenarios, your firm minimizes blind spots.
Provide a premium, white-glove experience by asking the exact right questions on day one.
LexOS Intell currently supports major jurisdictions including the US (Federal & State courts), the UK, EU regulatory bodies, and India (Supreme & High Courts). We are continually expanding our judicial databases.
Yes. You can upload internal discovery documents securely. These files are kept in a siloed, encrypted container and are never used to train the global litigation prediction model.
While no AI can guarantee a legal outcome, our predictive analytics achieve high accuracy by analyzing patterns across tens of thousands of historical judgments. It is designed to act as a powerful augmentative tool for human litigators, not a replacement.
Join leading modern legal teams and start streamlining your workflows today.